知識產(chǎn)權(quán)案例精選（2009-2010）

計算機軟件侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定
──蘇州東菱振動試驗儀器有限公司訴蘇州試驗儀器總廠等
計算機軟件著作權(quán)侵權(quán)糾紛
預(yù)裝計算機操作系統(tǒng)引發(fā)的著作權(quán)侵權(quán)行為的認(rèn)定
──微軟公司訴上海昶灃信息科技有限公司等侵犯計算機軟件著作權(quán)糾紛案
最終用戶軟件侵權(quán)案件中的證據(jù)保全
──微軟公司訴大眾保險股份有限公司侵犯計算機軟件著作權(quán)糾紛案
破壞軟件技術(shù)保護措施構(gòu)成侵犯軟件著作權(quán)
──上海地創(chuàng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)技術(shù)有限公司等訴北京萬戶名媒科技
有限公司等侵犯計算機軟件著作權(quán)糾紛案
計算機軟件用戶界面著作權(quán)侵權(quán)的判定
──摩卡軟件（天津）有限公司訴上海北塔軟件股份有限公司侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案
提供信息存儲空間的網(wǎng)絡(luò)服務(wù)商賠償責(zé)任之認(rèn)定
──上海激動網(wǎng)絡(luò)有限公司訴上海全土豆網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案
視頻分享網(wǎng)站的過錯認(rèn)定
──上海激動網(wǎng)絡(luò)有限公司訴上海全土豆網(wǎng)絡(luò)科技有限公司侵犯信息網(wǎng)絡(luò)傳播權(quán)糾紛案
實用藝術(shù)品的判斷標(biāo)準(zhǔn)
──英特-宜家系統(tǒng)有限公司訴臺州市中天塑業(yè)有限公司侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案
時事新聞的著作權(quán)保護
──劉昕等人訴上海圣慧信息技術(shù)有限公司侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案
理財網(wǎng)站擅自登載證券公司的研究報告等構(gòu)成侵權(quán)
──國金證券股份有限公司訴上海治平投資咨詢有限公司侵犯著作財產(chǎn)權(quán)糾紛案
文字商標(biāo)近似性的判定原則及商標(biāo)侵權(quán)的推定
──羅托克股份有限公司訴上海澳托克數(shù)字儀器有限公司等
商標(biāo)專用權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案
商標(biāo)近似的認(rèn)定
──雅培制藥有限公司訴汕頭市雅培食品有限公司等
侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案
商標(biāo)侵權(quán)判定中對類似商品的認(rèn)定
──廣州市高士實業(yè)有限公司訴好美家裝潢建材有限公司侵犯注冊商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案
商標(biāo)合理使用的判定
──大宇資訊股份有限公司訴上海盛大網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展
有限公司侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案
場所提供者商標(biāo)幫助侵權(quán)責(zé)任的認(rèn)定和責(zé)任形態(tài)
──拉科斯特股份有限公司訴上海龍華服飾禮品市場經(jīng)營管理
有限公司侵犯注冊商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案
特許人對被特許人的商標(biāo)侵權(quán)行為是否承擔(dān)連帶責(zé)任
──上海紅雙喜股份有限公司訴華聯(lián)集團吉買盛購物中心有限公司、
上海旺偉商貿(mào)有限公司侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)糾紛案
商標(biāo)法與反不正當(dāng)競爭法的周延保護
──上海鼎豐釀造食品有限公司訴被告上海鼎風(fēng)食品
有限公司侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)和不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛
企業(yè)名稱與商標(biāo)權(quán)利沖突的處理
──金山開發(fā)建設(shè)股份有限公司等訴上海鳳凰車件有限公司
侵犯商標(biāo)專用權(quán)及不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案
發(fā)明目的在權(quán)利要求解釋中的作用
──王群訴上海世博會法國館、中國建筑第八工程局
有限公司侵犯發(fā)明專利權(quán)糾紛案
說明書及附圖在解釋權(quán)利要求中的作用
──陳洪波訴上?？颇褰鹋浼邢薰厩址笇嵱眯滦蛯＠麢?quán)糾紛案
外觀設(shè)計相似性判斷的要點
──阿洛伊斯?F?多恩布拉赫特兩合公司訴江門市金凱登裝飾材料
實業(yè)有限公司等侵犯外觀設(shè)計專利糾紛案
專利保護范圍不包括發(fā)明所要克服的現(xiàn)有技術(shù)的缺陷
──宋建文訴明導(dǎo)（上海）電子科技有限公司等侵犯發(fā)明專利權(quán)糾紛案
現(xiàn)有技術(shù)抗辯中技術(shù)鑒定申請的審查
──上海三思科技發(fā)展有限公司等訴南京漢德森科技股份
有限公司侵犯實用新型專利權(quán)糾紛案
知名商品的認(rèn)定
──上海帕弗洛文化用品有限公司訴上海藝想文化用品有限公司
擅自使用知名商品特有名稱、包裝、裝潢糾紛案
外國企業(yè)名稱中字號的法律保護
──前田金屬工業(yè)株式會社訴濟南中普科技有限公司仿冒糾紛案
外國企業(yè)名稱中文譯名中字號的法律保護
──五合國際建筑設(shè)計集團訴劉力、上海五合國際建筑設(shè)計咨詢
有限公司等其他不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案
具有第二含義的通用名稱的成立要件及其保護
──上海人才網(wǎng)（集團）有限公司訴上海創(chuàng)匯信息科技
有限公司擅自使用他人企業(yè)名稱糾紛案
未經(jīng)許可接入QQ即時通訊系統(tǒng)構(gòu)成不正當(dāng)競爭
──深圳市騰訊計算機系統(tǒng)有限公司訴上海蔚藍(lán)計算機
有限公司等不正當(dāng)競爭糾紛案
濫用市場支配地位糾紛中的舉證責(zé)任與審理思路
──北京書生電子技術(shù)有限公司訴上海盛大網(wǎng)絡(luò)發(fā)展有限公司、
上海玄霆娛樂信息科技有限公司壟斷糾紛案
不侵權(quán)訴訟的成立條件及域名侵權(quán)的認(rèn)定
──吳鵬訴中國銀聯(lián)股份有限公司確認(rèn)不侵權(quán)糾紛案
未經(jīng)著作權(quán)人許可運營其網(wǎng)絡(luò)游戲構(gòu)成侵犯著作權(quán)罪
──張劍偉、游皇光侵犯著作權(quán)罪案
對尚未加工為成品的包裝及其他材料的認(rèn)定
──李應(yīng)才假冒注冊商標(biāo)案
“寬嚴(yán)相濟”的刑事政策在知識產(chǎn)權(quán)保護中的運用
──上海長正物資有限公司等銷售假冒注冊商標(biāo)的商品罪案
刑事二審新證據(jù)的審查及銷售假冒注冊商標(biāo)的商品罪中
“銷售金額”的認(rèn)定
──田龍泉、胡智慧銷售假冒注冊商標(biāo)的商品罪案
侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪的法律認(rèn)定
──上海芯略電子科技有限公司、張釗鋒侵犯商業(yè)秘密罪案
知產(chǎn)行政案件中對技術(shù)事實的審查
──上海全能科貿(mào)有限公司不服上海市知識產(chǎn)權(quán)局專利侵權(quán)糾紛處理決定案
“連續(xù)三年停止使用”商標(biāo)撤銷事由及撤銷權(quán)行使主體的認(rèn)定
──上海威雋建材有限公司訴上海市工商行政管理局浦東分局要求履行法定職責(zé)案
Determination of Infringement on Computer Software
—— Suzhou Dongling Vibration Testing Instrument Co., Ltd. v. Suzhou Testing Instrument General Factory et al Computer Software Copyright Infringement
Affirmation of Copyright Infringement Resulted from Preloading of Computer Operating System
—— Microsoft Corporation v. Shanghai Changfeng Information Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Computer Software Copyright Infringement
Evidence Preservation in Case of End User Infringing Software Right
—— Microsoft Corporation v. Dazhong Insurance Co., Ltd.
Computer Software Copyright Infringement
Sabotaging Technical Protection Measure for Software Constitutes Software Copyright Infringement
—— Shanghai Dichuang Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al v. Beijing Namex Media Science and Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Computer Software Copyright Infringement
Determination of User Interface Copyright Infringement
—— Mocha Software （Tianjin） Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Beita Software Co., Ltd.
Copyright Infringement
Determination of Compensation Liability of Network Service Provider Offering Information Storage Space
—— Shanghai Joy Net Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai TuDou Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Copyright Infringement
Determination of Liability for Fault of Video Sharing Website
—— Shanghai Joy Net Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai TuDou Network Technology Co., Ltd.
Infringement on the Right to Communicate Information over Network
Criteria to Determine Works of Applied Art
—— Inter-IKEA Systems B.V. v. Taizhou Zhongtian Plastic Co., Ltd.
Copyright Infringement
Protection of Copyright of Current News
—— Liu Xin et al v. Shanghai Shenghui Information Technology Co., Ltd.
Copyright Infringement
Publishing Research Report of Security Company by Financing Website without Authorization Constitutes Infringement
—— Sinolink Securities Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Zhiping Investment Consultation Co., Ltd.
Copyright Infringement
Judgment Principle for Similarity of Word Trademarks and Presumption of Infringement on Trademark
—— Rotork P.L.C. v. Shanghai Autork Digital Instruments Co., Ltd. et al
Registrated Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement and Unfair Competition
Determination of Similarity of Trademarks
—— Abbott Laboratories Limited v. Shantou Yapei Food Co., Ltd. et al
Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement and Unfair Competition
Determination of Similar Commodities in Judging Trademark Infringement
—— Guangzhou Glorystar Chemical Co., Ltd. v. HomeMart Decoration and Building Materials Co., Ltd. Registrated Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement
Determination of Reasonable Use of Trademark
—— Softstar Entertainment Inc. v. Shanghai Shanda Interactive Entertainment Limited
Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement
Determination of Liability of Venue Provider Aiding Trademark Infringement and Form of Liability
—— Lacoste Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Longhua Garment and Gift Market Operation and Management Co., Ltd. Registrated Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement
Whether Licensor Should Undertake Joint Liability for Licensee’s Infringement on Trademark Right
—— Shanghai Double Happiness Co., Ltd. v. GMS Shopping Center Co., Ltd. of Hualian Group and Shanghai Wangwei Commerce and Trading Co., Ltd. Registrated Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement
Complete Protection by Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law
—— Shanghai Dingfeng Fermented Food Co., Ltd. v. defendant Shanghai Dingfeng Food Co., Ltd. Trademark Exclusive Right Infringement and Unfair Competition
Disposition of Conflict of Trade name with Trademark Right
—— Jinshan Development and Construction Co., Ltd., etc. v. Shanghai Phoenix Bicycle Parts Co., Ltd. Exclusive Trademark Right Infringement and Unfair Competition
Role of Invention Objectives in Interpretation of Claims
—— Wang Qun v. Shanghai World Expo France Pavilion and CSCEC No. 8 Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd. Invention Patent Right Infringement
Role of Description and Appended Drawings in Interpreting Claims
—— Chen Hongbo v. Como Hardware Shanghai Co., Ltd. Utility Model Patent Right Infringement
Main Points in Determining Similarity in Designs
—— Aloys F.Dornbracht GMBH & CO.KG v. Jiangmen Goldiden Decoration Materials Industrial Co., Ltd. et al Design Patent Infringement
Scope of Protection for Patent Does not Cover Defects in Prior Art to be Overcome by the Invention
—— Song Jianwen v. Mingdao （Shanghai） Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. et al
Invention Patent Right Infringement
Examination of Request for Technical Appraisement in Plea of Prior art
—— Shanghai Sansi Technology Development Co., Ltd. and Others v. Nanjing Handson Science and Technology Co., Ltd. Utility Model Patent Infringement
Affirmation of Well-known Commodity
—— Shanghai Picasso Art Collection Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Yixiang Art Collection Co., Ltd.
Unauthorized Use of Name, Packaging and Decoration Specific to Well-known Commodity
Legal Protection for Foreign Enterprise Trade Names
—— Maeda Metal Industries, Ltd. v. Jinan Zhongpu Science and Technology Co., Ltd.
Dispute on Passing-off
Legal Protection of Trade Names in Chinese Translation of Foreign Trade names
—— Woodhead International Pty. Ltd. v. Liu Li, Shanghai Woodhead International Architecture Design and Consultation Co., Ltd. et al Unfair Competition
Essential Elements for A Generic Name to Acquire Specific Second Meaning and its Protection
—— Shanghai Talent Net （Group） Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Chuanghui Information and Science and Technology Co., Ltd.Unauthorized Use of Trade names of Others
Connection to QQ Instant Messaging System Without Permission Constitutes Unfair Competition
—— Shenzhen Tencent Computer System Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Weilan Computer Co., Ltd. et al Unfair Competition
Burden of Proof and Trial Guideline in Dispute on Abuse of Market Ascendancy
—— Beijing Shusheng Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Shanda Interactive Entertainment Limited and Shanghai Xuanting Entertainment Information Technology Co., Ltd. Monopoly Dispute
Tenable Conditions for Non-infringement Litigation and Determination of Domain Name Infringement
—— Wu Peng v. China Unionpay Co., Ltd. Demanding Affirmation of Non-infringement
Operating Online Games without Permission from Their Copyright Owner Constitutes Crime of Copyright Infringement
—— Zhang Jianwei and You Huangguang Committing Crime of Copyright Infringement
Determination of Packaging and Other Materials not Processed into Finished Products
—— Li Yingcai Counterfeiting Registered Trademark
Application of Criminal Policy “Tempering Justice with Mercy” in Protection of Intellectual Property
—— Shanghai Changzheng Materials Co., Ltd. et al
Crime of Selling Commodities with Counterfeited Registered Trademark
Examining New Evidences in Second Trial of Criminal Cases and Determining “Amount of Sales” in Crime of Selling Commodities Bearing Counterfeited Registered Trademarks
—— Tian Longquan and Hu Zhihui Crime of Selling Commodities with Counterfeited Registered Trademarks
Legal Determination of Crime of Trade Secret Infringement
—— Shanghai Xinlue Electronic Science and Technology Co., Ltd. and Zhang Zhaofeng
Crime of Trade Secret Infringement
Examination of Technical Facts in Administrative Cases Concerning Intellectual Property
—— Shanghai Quanneng Science and Trading Co., Ltd. Refusing to Accept Decision on Patent Infringement Dispute by Shanghai Intellectual Property Administration
Cause to Revoke Trademark for “No Use for Three Consecutive Years” and Determination of Subject Status to Implement Revoking Power
—— Shanghai Viva Building Materials Co., Ltd. v. Shanghai Municipal Industrial and Commercial Administration Pudong Branch Demanding Implementation of Legal Duties